Standardisation Compared to Adaptation in a Globalisation Framework

 Essay regarding Standardisation Versus Adaptation in a Globalisation Framework

Standardisation compared to Adaptation in a Globalisation framework


This is actually the challenge facing primarily multinational firms if to standardise their regional offering or perhaps adapt/localise it for industry they are providing into. In respect to Para Wit and Meyer (2010), the question facing managers is actually they should assume and motivate global affluence by emphasising global standardisation, centralisation and coordination or perhaps should managers acknowledge and exploit foreign diversity by emphasising local adaptation, decentralisation and autonomy. In other words while St Augustine (534-430) input it " after i am in Milan, I do as they carry out in Milan; but when My spouse and i go to Ancient rome, I do while Rome does”.

Technology affecting standardisation

What is strongly impacting on globalisation in the current context is technology. Technology is traveling converging commonality according to Levitt. Firms benefit even more from commonality i. electronic. standardisation than adaptation to the local market. I would suggest that globalisation have been good for the earth consumer in both abundant and poor countries. It has largely recently been achieved through standardisation. Particularly, corporations have benefited out of this standardised approach through financial systems of range in development, distribution, marketing and distribution.

Who also benefits?

As a result, the consumer provides greatly tips in the wealthy and poor countries because goods have reduced in cost. It can be argued this is simply for the intake of goods but not necessarily for the communities that may have when manufactured these kinds of goods in either wealthy or poor countries. It could have disastrous consequences when the manufacturer techniques out of the local community. Kanter (Best of HBR 1995) indicate it does not as she puts it " Really does globalisation must be at the expenditure of neighborhood? Not at all in the event that that community can become a world-class source of concepts, proficiency or connections. ”

Why Standardise?

Standardisation is in fact according to De Wit and Meyer (2010) " doing exactly the same thing in every single country without the costly adaptation”. Standardisation is achievable to apply to product offerings, value adding activities and resources utilized. As mentioned recently, standardisation is very important as commonly companies accomplish economies of scale nevertheless more importantly for consumers this enables them to get a " expected offering” in respect to Hamel and Prahalad (1985). Consumers all over the world know what to expect.

Companies standardise not just for organisational convenience but it is a means of obtaining cross-border groupe. Companies gain from this strategy by leveraging methods, integrating actions and aligning product offerings across several countries. For example , the Iphone has the same layout in terms of operating system /language applied for ALL OF US, Ireland, UK, Australia and also other English speaking countries. Making use of this standard US based approach permits Apple to attain huge financial systems of level and avoid the costly process of employing positionnement companies just like Lionbridge Systems, Sajan, welolocalize etc . to adapt the industry for the locale it truly is intended for. Buyers generally " accept” america English issues iPhones in relation to spelling and use of Software installed on their very own phones.

The main reason companies adopt this approach rather than localising for every locale is basically because the returning in expenditure would be utterly negligible, permits Apple to get a cost benefit and in the end keep the expense of the product down for the consumer. Other corporations such as Proctor and Wager take a multidomestic strategic strategy which is in essence treating the world as a profile of countrywide opportunities. The product is the same/standardised for each industry but the labelling or presentation has been adapted or localised for the marketplace it is marketed into. The company is hence avoiding R& D costs, " re-manufacturing” etc ....

Bibliography: Levitt (1984) The The positive effect of Market segments, 2-21. Available from Business Source Top [Accessed 22 November 2011]

Kanter (2003)Thriving locally inside the Global Overall economy, Harvard Business Review 119-127. Available from Business Origin Premier [Accessed 24 November 2011]

De Wit, B and Meyer R (2010) Strategy: Procedure, Content, Circumstance 4th Release, South American Cengage Learning

Douglas, T and Wind flow Y (1987) The Myth of Globalisation. Obtainable from Organization Source Premier [Accessed 23 November 2011]